23A-27-25. Fines and penalties paid into county treasury--Exceptions--Use for schools.
Except as provided below, all fines and pecuniary penalties collected for the violation of any state law must be paid into the treasury of the proper county, the net proceeds of which must be applied and used each year for the benefit of the public schools of this state. This section does not apply to forfeitures provided for in § 23A-43-23, costs as provided in §§ 23-3-52, 23A-27-25.9, 23A-27-26, and 23A-27-27, and restitution and civil penalties assessed under the state's environmental laws.
Source: SDC 1939, § 13.0113; SDCL, § 23-48-30; SL 1975, ch 162, § 14; SL 1978, ch 178, § 367; SL 1982, ch 186, § 3; SL 1988, ch 291, § 25; SL 1989, ch 211, § 3; SL 2024, ch 92, § 2.
23A-27-25.1. Provisions for payment of fines, costs and restitution, etc.--Community service.
If a defendant sentenced to be imprisoned or jailed has part or all of his imprisonment or jail time suspended upon conditions that include payment of a fine, costs, and restitution, or any of them, or if a defendant is sentenced to pay a fine, costs, and restitution, or any of them, the lay magistrate, the magistrate judge or circuit court judge may require:
(1) Execution by the defendant of a wage assignment if he is employed in this state, which assignment shall direct his employer to withhold and remit that amount to the clerk of courts up to the total of the fine, costs, and restitution;
(2) A payment schedule. The magistrate judge or circuit court may require the defendant to personally appear before the court or an officer of the court as designated, from time to time, to pay such installments or justify the failure to timely do so. Failure to so appear is a prima facie violation of the suspended sentence of imprisonment, jail, or contempt;
(3) Community service under terms and conditions established by the court. For purposes of computing community service time, eight hours shall be equal to one day of imprisonment. The community service time may not exceed the maximum time authorized for the offense charged.
The provisions of this section shall not apply to suspensions of drivers' licenses pursuant to § 32-12-49.
Subdivisions (1) to (3), inclusive, are not exclusive as to conditions which may be imposed. A defendant is any person who has been convicted of a criminal offense or who has been granted a suspended imposition of sentence.
Source: SL 1989, ch 211, § 4.
23A-27-25.2. Costs and restitution designated as punishment.
In any case in which they are imposed, costs and restitution are a portion of the punishment.
Source: SL 1989, ch 211, § 5.
23A-27-25.3. Failure to comply with conditions of suspended sentence--Defendant to show cause.
If a defendant sentenced to be imprisoned or jailed has part or all of the imprisonment or jail time suspended upon conditions that include that he pay a fine, costs, or restitution and fails to comply with any of these conditions, the court may, upon its own motion or upon motion of the state's attorney, require the defendant to show cause why he should not be imprisoned or jailed for failure to comply with the conditions of the sentence. The court may issue a warrant of arrest, bench warrant, or order to show cause for the convicted defendant's appearance.
Source: SL 1989, ch 211, § 6.
23A-27-25.4. Default in payment of fine or costs and restitution.
If a defendant sentenced to pay a fine, costs, or restitution, defaults in the timely payment thereof, the court may, upon its own motion or upon motion of the state's attorney, require the defendant to show cause why he should not be imprisoned or jailed for nonpayment. The court may issue a warrant of arrest, bench warrant, or order to show cause for the defendant's appearance.
Source: SL 1989, ch 211, § 7.
23A-27-25.5. Hearing required prior to imprisonment or jailing for failure to pay fine, costs, and restitution--Burden of proof--Computation of time to be served.
No defendant may be imprisoned or jailed for failure to pay a fine, costs, or restitution or have any suspended prison or jail sentence revoked without a prior hearing. At the hearing, the defendant has the burden of proof to establish to the reasonable satisfaction of the magistrate or circuit judge that the defendant did not willfully fail to pay the fine, costs, or restitution or that the defendant did make a bona fide effort to pay the fine, costs, or restitution.
Failure by the defendant to make such a showing is grounds for being imprisoned or jailed. If the sentence provided for payment of fine or costs only, the term of jail or imprisonment may be no longer than the number of days equal to the total amount of the fine or costs imposed divided by sixty. For purposes of making this computation, any fraction of less than one day shall be dropped from the term of imprisonment. In no event may such imprisonment for failure to pay the fine, costs, and restitution together with all other time served or to be served exceed the maximum allowed by statute.
If the defendant establishes that nonpayment was not willful or that the defendant did make a bona fide effort to pay, the defendant may not be imprisoned or jailed for nonpayment. The magistrate or circuit judge shall consider other alternatives which take into account the state's interest in punishment and deterrence.
The court shall make findings in its decision.
Source: SL 1989, ch 211, § 8; SL 2004, ch 163, § 1; SL 2010, ch 130, § 1.
23A-27-25.6. Fine, costs, or restitution as a lien in civil action--No discharge from imprisonment until full amount paid.
If the sentence includes a fine, costs, or restitution, execution may issue thereon as a judgment against the convicted defendant in a civil action. Such a judgment is a lien and may be docketed and collected in the same manner. If the defendant is in default on payment, the levy or execution for the collection of the fine, costs, or restitution, do not discharge a defendant committed to imprisonment for contempt pursuant to this chapter until the amount due has actually been collected.
Source: SL 1989, ch 211, § 9.
23A-27-25.7. Objection to fines or costs--Defendant sentenced to state correctional facility--Hearing.
If the sentencing court orders a defendant to a state correctional facility and the defendant objects at sentencing to the fines or costs imposed as a portion of the punishment on the basis the defendant will be ineligible to receive a wage for work performed while incarcerated because the defendant does not have a verifiable Social Security number, the defendant is entitled to a hearing at which the court shall determine whether there is good cause to reduce the fines or costs pursuant to § 23A-27-25.8 by a preponderance of the evidence. In making this determination, the court shall consider the defendant's employment circumstances, potential for employment and vocational training, financial condition, and other factors as may be appropriate.
Source: SL 2022, ch 73, § 1; SL 2023, ch 82, § 29.
23A-27-25.8. Reduction of fines or costs for work performed--Department of Corrections to track--Defendant responsible for remainder.
If the sentencing court finds good cause to reduce the fees or costs imposed under § 23A-27-25.7, the court shall issue an order stating that the defendant shall be credited the current rate of pay for institutional work assignments against the fines or costs imposed in the priority ordered by the court. The reduction must be in accordance with work performed by the defendant related to reasonable institutional work assignments. Any work required as a disciplinary sanction for misconduct may not count as a credit against fines or costs imposed. The Department of Corrections shall record the number of hours the defendant worked pursuant to this section. The defendant shall be responsible for any outstanding amount following release from incarceration.
Source: SL 2022, ch 73, § 2.
23A-27-25.9. Cost of digital forensic examination--Convicted defendant to reimburse--Cost capped--Deposit--"Personal electronic device" defined.
A person convicted of a felony or misdemeanor shall, as part of the sentence imposed by the court, pay for the reimbursement of the cost of any digital forensic examination performed on any personal electronic device in the investigation and prosecution of the crime for which the defendant is convicted. The fee assessed may not exceed ninety-five dollars for each device. Fees collected pursuant to this section by the Unified Judicial System must be deposited in the internet crimes investigation fund, created in § 1-11-36.
For the purposes of this section, the term "personal electronic device" means any portable electronic device that is designed for and capable of wireless communication or electronic data retrieval, including a cellular telephone, tablet, laptop, computer, or two-way messaging device.
Source: SL 2024, ch 92, § 1.