49-41B-22Applicant's burden of proof.

The applicant has the burden of proof to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that:

(1)    The proposed facility will comply with all applicable laws and rules;

(2)    The facility will not pose a threat of serious injury to the environment nor to the social and economic condition of inhabitants or expected inhabitants in the siting area. An applicant for an electric transmission line, a solar energy facility, or a wind energy facility that holds a conditional use permit from the applicable local units of government is determined not to threaten the social and economic condition of inhabitants or expected inhabitants in the siting area;

(3)    The facility will not substantially impair the health, safety or welfare of the inhabitants; and

(4)    The facility will not unduly interfere with the orderly development of the region with due consideration having been given the views of governing bodies of affected local units of government. An applicant for an electric transmission line, a solar energy facility, or a wind energy facility that holds a conditional use permit from the applicable local units of government is in compliance with this subdivision.

Source: SL 1977, ch 390, § 17; SL 1981, ch 340, § 3; SL 1991, ch 386, § 6; SL 2019, ch 200, § 8.




SDLRC - Codified Law 49-41B-22 - Applicant's burden of proof.

49-41B-22.1Reapplication for permit--Applicant's burden of proof--Environmental impact statement not required.

Nothing contained herein shall prohibit an applicant from reapplying for a permit previously denied pursuant to § 49-41B-24 or 49-41B-25 within three years from the date of the denial of the original permit. Upon the first such reapplication, the applicant shall have the burden of proof to establish only those criteria upon which the original permit was denied, provided that nothing in the reapplication materially changes the information presented in the original application regarding those criteria upon which the original permit was not denied. However, nothing contained in this provision shall prohibit the Public Utilities Commission from requiring such applicant to meet its burden of proof as to any criteria, upon a specific finding by the commission of a material change in the circumstances regarding those criteria, but the Public Utilities Commission shall not, in any event, prepare or require the preparation of an environmental impact statement.

Source: SL 1982, ch 333, § 1.




SDLRC - Codified Law 49-41B-22 - Applicant's burden of proof.

49-41B-22.2Reapplication for permit--Discussion of commission as to applicant's burden of proof.

If a second or subsequent reapplication is filed within three years, or a reapplication is filed after three years, following a denial of a permit pursuant to § 49-41B-24 or 49-41B-25, the Public Utilities Commission may in its discretion decide if an applicant shall have the burden of proof to establish all criteria required in an original application.

Source: SL 1982, ch 333, § 2.




SDLRC - Codified Law 49-41B-22 - Applicant's burden of proof.

49-41B-22.3Reapplication for permit--Deposits and fees required.

The provisions of § 49-41B-12 relating to deposits and fees required of applicants shall apply to all reapplications made pursuant to §§ 49-41B-22.1 and 49-41B-22.2.

Source: SL 1982, ch 333, § 3.