State of South Dakota
|
SEVENTY-SECOND
SESSION
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, 1997 |
754A0754 |
HOUSE BILL
NO.
1253
|
Introduced by: Representatives Haley, Cutler, Duxbury, Gabriel, Koetzle, Lucas, and Roe and Senators Olson, Everist, Flowers, Hunhoff, and Paisley |
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA:
Section 1. There is hereby established within the Unified Judicial System the visitation enforcement program to provide divorced or divorcing parents with effective, efficient, and inexpensive intervention to attain voluntary compliance with the provisions of any valid and continuing visitation or custody decree or the collateral provisions of any child support decree not statutorily enforced by the Department of Social Services.
Section 2. The parent of any minor child shall participate in parenting instruction provided as part of the visitation enforcement program before a final divorce decree may be granted by the court. The parents of the child need not attend the same instruction session. The court may excuse a parent from the provisions of this section only for good cause shown.
Section 3. Each case manager of the visitation enforcement program shall hear and attempt to resolve, by agreement between the parties, complaints about the adherence of one or both parents to the terms of the visitation or custody decree or the collateral provisions of the child
support decree. Once the intervention of the case manager has been sought by either party, the
case manager may do whatever may be reasonable to resolve the current or foreseeable conflicts
including investigation, admonition, interpretation, recommendation, suggestion, or advice. The
case manager may also suggest that the parties hire a mediator if the circumstances warrant.
Section
4.
No parent, as a result of the visitation enforcement program, need have any direct
contact with the other parent, either in person or by telecommunications, if unwilling to do so.
No case manager may suggest direct contact between the parents if there is reason to believe
that one may have physically or emotionally abused the other.
Section
5.
The services of the case manager are informal and are to be considered to be in
the nature of an ombudsman relationship. Neither party need adhere to any admonition,
interpretation, recommendation, or suggestion of the case manager. However, if there is
subsequent litigation between the parties, the court may request, and the case manager may
relate, the particulars of the case manager's involvement in the dispute as well as an opinion
about the good faith and course of conduct of the parties.
Section
6.
The Unified Judicial System shall hire, train, and administer such personnel as
may be necessary to effectuate the purposes of this Act. One or more case managers shall be
employed or reassigned in each judicial circuit to provide continuing intervention services and
to provide parenting instruction. If there is not sufficient demand for these services in any
circuit, the employee may be compensated as a part-time employee or, if full-time, may be
assigned additional duties.
Section
7.
The effective date of sections 1 to 6, inclusive, of this Act is January 1, 1999.
Section
8.
There is hereby created the Visitation Enforcement Program Implementation Task
Force to study, plan, provide for, and implement sections 1 to 6, inclusive, of this Act. The Task
Force shall be composed of three circuit court judges appointed by the Chief Justice of the
Supreme Court, two members of the Bar appointed by the president of the South Dakota Bar
Association, and four legislators, one appointed by each of the majority and minority leaders
of the Senate and House of Representatives. The members may elect a chair from among their
members. The Task Force shall be staffed by the Unified Judicial System with the assistance
of the Legislative Research Council. The Task Force shall report its findings to the Legislature
from time to time as appropriate and may recommend necessary legislation.
Section
9.
There is hereby appropriated one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) of federal
fund authority, or so much thereof as may be necessary, to the Unified Judicial System to
prepare for and implement sections 1 to 6, of this Act. However the Unified Judicial System
may expend no more than thirty-one thousand dollars of this appropriation to pay any expenses
of the Task Force provided for in section 8 of this Act.
Section
10.
The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court shall approve vouchers and the state
auditor shall draw warrants to pay expenditures authorized by this Act.
Section
11.
Any amounts appropriated in this Act not lawfully expended or obligated by
June
30,
2000, shall revert in accordance with
§
4-8-21.