State of South Dakota
|
SEVENTY-THIRD
SESSION
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, 1998 |
529B0342 |
HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
ENGROSSED
NO.
HB1054
-
1/26/98
|
Introduced by: The Committee on Judiciary at the request of the Chief Justice |
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act
to revise the definition of consanguinity and affinity in
challenges for cause in jury trials.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA:
Section 1. That § 23A-20-13 be amended to read as follows:
23A-20-13. A challenge for implied bias may be taken for
all or
any of the following causes,
and for no other:
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA:
Section 1. That § 23A-20-13 be amended to read as follows:
23A-20-13. A challenge for implied bias may be taken for
(1)
The juror has a consanguinity or affinity within the sixth degree, inclusive, as
determined by
the common law
section 3 of this Act
, to the person alleged to be
injured by the offense charged, or on whose complaint the prosecution was instituted,
or to the defendant;
(2)
The juror is a guardian, ward, client, employer, employee, landlord, tenant, or a
member of the household of the defendant, the person alleged to be injured by the
offense charged, the person on whose complaint the prosecution was instituted, or the
prosecuting attorney or the defense attorney;
(3)
The juror is a party adverse to the defendant in a civil action, or has complained
against or been accused by the defendant in a criminal action;
(4)
The juror served on a grand jury which found the indictment, or on a coroner's jury
which inquired into the death of a person whose death is the subject of the
prosecution;
(5)
The juror served on a trial jury which tried another person for the offense charged in
the indictment or information;
(6)
The juror was a member of a jury formerly sworn to try the indictment, information,
or complaint, and whose verdict was set aside or which was discharged without a
verdict;
(7)
The juror served as a juror in a civil action brought against the defendant for the act
charged as an offense;
(8)
The juror applied directly or indirectly to a sheriff, deputy sheriff, or coroner of the
county to be summoned for jury duty; or
(9)
The juror served as a juror on the trial of a case in a court of record in the county
within four years prior to the opening day of the term of court during which
summoned as a juror, or was a party to any suit pending for trial in that county at that
term of court. However, in counties of less than five thousand population or more
than one hundred thousand population, the applicable time period shall be two years
rather than four years.
Section 2. That § 15-14-6 be amended to read as follows:
15-14-6. Challenges for cause may be taken on
one or more
any
of the following grounds:
Section 2. That § 15-14-6 be amended to read as follows:
15-14-6. Challenges for cause may be taken on
(1)
A want of any of the qualifications prescribed by chapter 16-13 to render a person
competent as a juror;
(2)
Consanguinity or affinity, within the fourth degree
as determined by section 3 of this
Act
, to either party;
(3)
That the relationship of guardian and ward, master and servant, employer and clerk,
or principal and agent exists between the juror and any party to the action; or that the
juror is a member of the family of any party to the action; or that the juror is a partner
in business with any party or surety on any bond or obligation for any party; that the
relationship of attorney and client exists between the juror and any attorney in the
case; that the juror is an officer, agent, or employee of any corporation between
which corporation and any attorney in the case the relationship of attorney and client
exists; that the juror is the spouse of any attorney in the case or the spouse of a person
who if called as a juror in the case would be subject to challenge for cause under
subdivision (2), subdivision (3), or subdivision (4) of this section;
(4)
Having served as a juror or been a witness on a previous trial between the same
parties for the same cause of action;
(5)
Interest on the part of the juror in the event of the action, or in the main question
involved in the action, except an interest as a member or citizen of a municipal
corporation;
(6)
Having an unqualified opinion or belief as to the merits of the action founded upon
knowledge of its material facts, or some of them;
(7)
The existence of a state of mind in the juror evincing enmity against, or bias to or
against the other party;
(8)
That the juror does not understand the English language as used in the courts;
(9)
That the juror has served as a juror on the trial of a cause in any court of record in the
county within four years previous to the time of being offered as a juror. However,
in counties of less than five thousand population or more than one hundred thousand
population, the applicable time period shall be two years rather than four years;
(10)
Having applied directly to a sheriff or deputy sheriff of the county in which the
person is drawn to be summoned as a juror at the term of court then held;
(11)
That the juror is a party to a suit pending for trial in the court at that term.
Section 3. The degree of kindred is established by the number of generations, and each generation is called a degree. The series of degrees form the line; the series of degrees between persons who descend from one another is called direct or lineal consanguinity; and the series of degrees between persons who do not descend from one another, but spring from a common ancestor, is called the collateral line or collateral consanguinity.
Section 3. The degree of kindred is established by the number of generations, and each generation is called a degree. The series of degrees form the line; the series of degrees between persons who descend from one another is called direct or lineal consanguinity; and the series of degrees between persons who do not descend from one another, but spring from a common ancestor, is called the collateral line or collateral consanguinity.
The direct line is divided into a direct line descending and a direct line ascending. The first
is that which connects the ancestor with those who descend from that ancestor. The second is
that which connects a person with those from whom that person descends. In the direct line
there are as many degrees as there are generations. Thus the son is, with regard to the father, in
the first degree; the grandson in the second; and vice versa with regard to the father and
grandfather toward the sons and grandsons.
In the collateral line the degrees are counted by generations from one of the relations up to
the common ancestor, and from the common ancestor to the other relations. In such computation
the person whose consanguinity or affinity is being determined is excluded, the relative
included, and the ancestor counted but once. Thus brothers are related in the second degree,
uncle and nephew in the third degree, cousins germane in the fourth degree, and so on.
BILL HISTORY
1/14/98 First read in House and referred to Judiciary. H.J. 37
1/23/98 Scheduled for Committee hearing on this date.
1/23/98 Judiciary Do Pass Amended, Passed, AYES 12, NAYS 0. H.J. 194
1/23/98 Judiciary Place on Consent Calendar.
BILL HISTORY
1/14/98 First read in House and referred to Judiciary. H.J. 37
1/23/98 Scheduled for Committee hearing on this date.
1/23/98 Judiciary Do Pass Amended, Passed, AYES 12, NAYS 0. H.J. 194
1/23/98 Judiciary Place on Consent Calendar.