|
State of South Dakota
|
|
SEVENTY-FOURTH
SESSION
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, 1999 |
| 447C0744 |
HOUSE BILL
NO.
1217
|
| Introduced by: Representatives Hennies, Apa, Broderick, Koehn, Kooistra, Lintz, and McIntyre and Senators Ham, Albers, Bogue, Drake, Dunn (Rebecca), Kleven, Lawler, and Vitter |
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
revise the procedure for determining the period of time
that has elapsed for a person who was previously convicted of driving under the influence.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA:
Section 1. That § 32-23-4.1 be amended to read as follows:
32-23-4.1. No previous conviction for, or plea of guilty to , a violation of § 32-23-1 occurring more than five years prior to the date of the violation being charged may be used to determine that the violation being charged is a second, third, or subsequent offense. However, any period of time during which the defendant was incarcerated for a previous violation may not be included when calculating if the five-year time period has elapsed.
750 copies of this document were printed by the South Dakota
Legislative Research Council at a cost of $.016 per page. . Insertions into existing statutes are indicated by underscores.
Deletions from existing statutes are indicated byoverstrikes.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA:
Section 1. That § 32-23-4.1 be amended to read as follows:
32-23-4.1. No previous conviction for, or plea of guilty to , a violation of § 32-23-1 occurring more than five years prior to the date of the violation being charged may be used to determine that the violation being charged is a second, third, or subsequent offense. However, any period of time during which the defendant was incarcerated for a previous violation may not be included when calculating if the five-year time period has elapsed.
Legislative Research Council at a cost of $.016 per page. . Insertions into existing statutes are indicated by underscores.
Deletions from existing statutes are indicated by
