State of South Dakota
|
SEVENTY-SEVENTH
SESSION
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, 2002 |
391H0028 |
HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE ENGROSSED
NO.
HB 1220
-
02/04/2002
|
Introduced by:
Representatives Murschel, Bartling, Brown (Jarvis), Davis, Derby, Hennies
(Thomas), Jensen, Juhnke, Kooistra, Madsen, and Slaughter and Senators
Everist and Daugaard
|
FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to
allow certain third parties to intervene in a custody
dispute of a child.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA:
Section 1. In disputes regarding custody of a child, the court may allow an interested third party to intervene upon motion. Before allowing intervention, the court may appoint counsel for the child. The court may award full or partial custody, care, education, and visitation rights of the child to any interested third party upon such conditions and limitations as the court deems equitable.
Section 2. In making any order pursuant to section 1 of this Act, the court shall be guided by the best interests of the child, giving consideration to the wishes of the child if the child is of sufficient age and capable of forming an intelligent preference.
Section 3. In disputes regarding custody of a child between a parent and an interested third party, the presumption in favor of the parent may be rebutted by showing extraordinary circumstances. For the purposes of this section, the term, extraordinary circumstances, means
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA:
Section 1. In disputes regarding custody of a child, the court may allow an interested third party to intervene upon motion. Before allowing intervention, the court may appoint counsel for the child. The court may award full or partial custody, care, education, and visitation rights of the child to any interested third party upon such conditions and limitations as the court deems equitable.
Section 2. In making any order pursuant to section 1 of this Act, the court shall be guided by the best interests of the child, giving consideration to the wishes of the child if the child is of sufficient age and capable of forming an intelligent preference.
Section 3. In disputes regarding custody of a child between a parent and an interested third party, the presumption in favor of the parent may be rebutted by showing extraordinary circumstances. For the purposes of this section, the term, extraordinary circumstances, means
circumstances that result in serious detriment to the child, including any one or more of the
following:
(1) The abandonment or persistent neglect of the child by the parent;
(2) The likelihood of serious physical or emotional harm to the child if placed in the
parent's custody;
(3) The extended, unjustifiable absence of parental custody;
(4) The abdication of parental responsibilities;
(5) The provision of the child's physical, emotional, and other needs by persons other than
the parent over a significant period of time;
(6) The existence of a bonded relationship between the child and the nonparent custodian
sufficient to cause significant emotional harm to the child in the event of a change in
custody;
(7) The substantial enhancement of the child's well-being while under the care of the
nonparent;
(8) The extent of the parent's delay in seeking to reacquire custody of the child;
(9) The demonstrated quality of the parent's commitment to raising the child;
10) The likely degree of stability and security in the child's future with the parent;
(11) The extent to which the child's right to an education would be impaired while in the
custody of the parent; or
(12) Any other circumstances that would substantially and adversely impact the welfare of
the child.