MyLRC +
HB 1220 revise certain provisions with regard to child...

State of South Dakota  
SEVENTY-SEVENTH SESSION
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY,  2002
 

391H0028  
HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE ENGROSSED   NO. HB 1220   -   02/04/2002  

        Introduced by: Representatives Murschel, Bartling, Brown (Jarvis), Davis, Derby, Hennies (Thomas), Jensen, Juhnke, Kooistra, Madsen, and Slaughter and Senators Everist and Daugaard  


         FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to  allow certain third parties to intervene in a custody dispute of a child.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA:
     Section  1.  In disputes regarding custody of a child, the court may allow an interested third party to intervene upon motion. Before allowing intervention, the court may appoint counsel for the child. The court may award full or partial custody, care, education, and visitation rights of the child to any interested third party upon such conditions and limitations as the court deems equitable.
     Section  2.  In making any order pursuant to section 1 of this Act, the court shall be guided by the best interests of the child, giving consideration to the wishes of the child if the child is of sufficient age and capable of forming an intelligent preference.
     Section  3.  In disputes regarding custody of a child between a parent and an interested third party, the presumption in favor of the parent may be rebutted by showing extraordinary circumstances. For the purposes of this section, the term, extraordinary circumstances, means

circumstances that result in serious detriment to the child, including any one or more of the following:

             (1)    The abandonment or persistent neglect of the child by the parent;
             (2)    The likelihood of serious physical or emotional harm to the child if placed in the parent's custody;
             (3)    The extended, unjustifiable absence of parental custody;
             (4)    The abdication of parental responsibilities;
             (5)    The provision of the child's physical, emotional, and other needs by persons other than the parent over a significant period of time;
             (6)    The existence of a bonded relationship between the child and the nonparent custodian sufficient to cause significant emotional harm to the child in the event of a change in custody;
             (7)    The substantial enhancement of the child's well-being while under the care of the nonparent;
             (8)    The extent of the parent's delay in seeking to reacquire custody of the child;
             (9)    The demonstrated quality of the parent's commitment to raising the child;
             10)    The likely degree of stability and security in the child's future with the parent;
             (11)    The extent to which the child's right to an education would be impaired while in the custody of the parent; or
             (12)    Any other circumstances that would substantially and adversely impact the welfare of the child.