MyLRC +
SB 72 revise certain provisions regarding the consideration of joint p...
State of South Dakota  
NINETY-SECOND SESSION
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, 2017  

486Y0098   SENATE JUDICIARY ENGROSSED    NO.  SB 72 -  1/26/2017  

Introduced by:    Senators Jensen (Phil), Greenfield (Brock), Heinert, Nelson, Netherton, and Russell and Representatives Pischke, Clark, Dennert, Frye-Mueller, Gosch, Greenfield (Lana), Haugaard, Howard, Kaiser, Latterell, Marty, May, Rasmussen, Smith, and Zikmund
 

        FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to revise certain provisions regarding the consideration of joint physical custody of a minor.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA:
    Section 1. That § 25-4A-26 be repealed.
    25-4A-26. Nothing in §§ 25-4A-21 to 25-4A-27, inclusive, creates a presumption of joint physical custody. The court shall determine the appropriate physical care, custody, and control of a minor child based on a determination of the best interests of the child.
    Section 2. That the code be amended by adding a NEW SECTION to read:
    If joint legal custody is awarded, pursuant to § 25-5-7.1, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that both parents have joint physical custody of their children. Joint physical custody of the children is defined as equal parenting time. The burden of overcoming the presumption rests on the parent challenging the presumption. The presumption may be overcome by demonstrating that joint physical custody would not be in the best interest of the

children by weighing the factors set forth in §§ 25-4A-21 to 25-4A-27, inclusive, or by one parent waiving the presumption. The burden of proof necessary to overcome the presumption shall be by a preponderance of the evidence. If the court finds that a party has overcome the presumption in favor of joint physical custody, then the court shall use the best interests of the child to make its determination for custodial arrangements.
    Section 3. That the code be amended by adding a NEW SECTION to read:

    The court shall require the parents to prepare and submit a parenting plan to the court reflecting parental preferences and agreement on the matters of substance concerning the child's education, upbringing, religious training, medical, and dental care. The parents shall share decision-making authority and responsibility as to the important decisions affecting the child's welfare and if parents are unable to agree, the court may order the parties to submit to a preselected mediator.
    Section 4. That chapter 25-4A be amended by adding a NEW SECTION to read:
    A finding by the court that, within the last two years, a parent has abused drugs or alcohol or has a conviction related to possession or distribution of a controlled substance or marijuana, as defined in chapter 22-42; drug paraphernalia, as defined in § 22-42A-3 or 22-42A-4; driving while under the influence, as defined in chapter 32-23; or a substantially similar federal offense creates a rebuttable presumption that joint physical custody is not in the best interests of the child.