State of South Dakota
|
NINETY-FOURTH SESSION LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, 2019 |
378B0663 | SENATE BILL NO. 185 |
Introduced by: Senators Solano, Soholt, and Steinhauer and Representatives Diedrich,
Barthel, Duvall, Glanzer, and Johns
|
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA:
Section 1. That § 23A-10A-4 be amended to read:
23A-10A-4. If, after the hearing, the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant is presently suffering from a mental disease or developmental disability, or other conditions set forth in § 23A-10A-1, rendering
is not owned by the state without first obtaining the consent of the administrator of the privately
owned facility.
Section 2. That § 23A-10A-4.1 be amended to read:
23A-10A-4.1. If the director of the facility in which where the defendant is being treated
pursuant to § 23A-10A-4 determines that the defendant has recovered to such an extent that he
or she the defendant is able to understand the nature and consequences of the proceedings
against him the defendant and to assist properly in his or her defense, he the director shall
promptly file a certificate to that effect with the clerk of the court that ordered the placement or
commitment. The court shall send a copy of the certificate to the defendant's counsel and to the
prosecuting attorney. The court shall hold a hearing, conducted pursuant to under the provisions
of § 23A-46-3, to determine the competency of the defendant. If, after the hearing, the court
finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant has recovered to such an extent that
he the defendant is capable of understanding the nature and consequences of the proceedings
against him the defendant and to assist properly in his or her defense, the court shall order his
the defendant's immediate discharge from the facility in which he where the defendant is
hospitalized, if applicable, and shall set the date for trial. Upon discharge, the defendant is
subject to the provisions of chapter 23A-43. If, after the hearing, the court does not find by a
preponderance of the evidence that the defendant has recovered to such an extent that he the
defendant is capable of understanding the nature and consequences of the proceedings against
him the defendant and to assist properly in his or her defense, the court shall order him the
defendant to again be placed in an approved facility for a term consistent with this section and
§§ 23A-10A-14 and 23A-10A-15.
Section 3. That § 23A-10A-14 be amended to read:
23A-10A-14. After four months of evaluation, pursuant to § 23A-10A-4, if the facility has
not certified that the defendant is competent to proceed, pursuant to § 23A-10A-4.1, the director
of the approved facility shall issue a report to the circuit court evaluating whether there is a
substantial probability that within the next year the defendant will become competent to
proceed. After receipt of that report by the circuit court, the court shall set a time for hearing to
determine whether or not the defendant is reasonably likely to become competent to proceed
within the next year.
Section 4. That § 23A-10A-15 be amended to read:
23A-10A-15. If the most serious charge against the defendant is a Class A or B felony, the
order of detention shall be for any period of time deemed reasonable by the court or until the
charges have been dismissed by the prosecution. The order for detention may not exceed the
maximum penalty allowable for the most serious charge facing the defendant. Upon expiration
of the order of detention, or after the expiration of the longest time the defendant could have
been sentenced, whichever is longest, the criminal charges against the defendant shall be
dismissed. If the prosecutor believes that there is probable cause to believe that the defendant
is a danger to himself, herself, or others at the time of such dismissal, he the prosecutor may file
a petition pursuant to chapter 27A-10 or 27A-11A or Title 27B, for further treatment.
Section 5. That chapter 23A-10A be amended by adding a NEW SECTION to read: