MyLRC +
Codified Laws
23A-22 EVIDENCE
CHAPTER 23A-22

EVIDENCE

23A-22-1      (Rule 26) Reserved.
23A-22-2      Civil rules applicable except as provided.
23A-22-3      Innocence presumed--Reasonable doubt requires acquittal.
23A-22-4      Facts put in issue by not guilty plea.
23A-22-5      Burden of proof as to mitigation or excuse in homicide prosecution.
23A-22-6      Defendant's right to testify--No presumption from failure to testify.
23A-22-7      Discharge of defendant to testify against codefendant.
23A-22-8      Corroboration of accomplice's testimony required for conviction.
23A-22-9      (Rule 26.1) Notice of issue concerning law of foreign country--Sources considered--Determination as question of law.
23A-22-10      (Rule 27) Proof of official record or lack of record.
23A-22-11      (Rule 28) Appointment and compensation of interpreter.
23A-22-12      Dying declarations defined--Admissibility in homicide prosecutions--Admissibility for defense.
23A-22-13      Overt acts required for conspiracy conviction.
23A-22-14      Proof of incorporation of bank not required in forgery or counterfeiting prosecution--Expert testimony as to forgery or counterfeiting.
23A-22-15, 23A-22-15.1. Repealed.
23A-22-16      Proof of marriages in bigamy prosecutions.
23A-22-17      View of place of offense by jury--Protection of jury from unlawful communication.



23A-22-1
     23A-22-1.   (Rule 26) Reserved



23A-22-2Civil rules applicable except as provided.

The rules of evidence in civil cases are applicable also to criminal cases, except as otherwise provided in this title.

Source: Supreme Court Rule 399, 1939; SDC 1939 & Supp 1960, § 34.3631; SDCL, § 23-44-9; SL 1978, ch 178, § 279.



23A-22-3Innocence presumed--Reasonable doubt requires acquittal.

A defendant in a criminal action is presumed to be innocent until the contrary is proved, and in case of a reasonable doubt as to whether his guilt is satisfactorily shown, he is entitled to be acquitted.

Source: SDC 1939 & Supp 1960, § 34.3635; SDCL, § 23-44-5; SL 1978, ch 178, § 281.



23A-22-4Facts put in issue by not guilty plea.

A plea of not guilty puts in issue every material fact constituting an offense charged in an indictment, information, or complaint.

Source: Supreme Court Rule 390, 1939; SDC 1939 & Supp 1960, § 34.3521; SDCL, § 23-35-23; SL 1978, ch 178, § 280.



23A-22-5Burden of proof as to mitigation or excuse in homicide prosecution.

In prosecutions for murder, after the prosecution has proved that a defendant committed the homicide, the burden of proving circumstances of mitigation, or that justify or excuse it, passes to the defendant, unless the proof of the prosecution shows that the crime committed only amounts to manslaughter or that the defendant was justified or excused.

Source: Supreme Court Rule 402, 1939; SDC 1939 & Supp 1960, § 34.3642; SDCL, § 23-44-15; SL 1978, ch 178, § 289.



23A-22-6Defendant's right to testify--No presumption from failure to testify.

In a trial of all indictments, informations, complaints, and other proceedings before any court or magistrate, against persons charged with the commission of any crime, the person charged shall, at his own request, but not otherwise, be a competent witness. His failure to make such request does not create any presumption against him.

Source: SDC 1939 & Supp 1960, § 34.3633; SDCL, § 23-44-1; SL 1978, ch 178, § 282.



23A-22-7Discharge of defendant to testify against codefendant.

When two or more persons are included in the same indictment or information, a court may on the application of the prosecuting attorney, at any time before the defendants have gone into their defense, direct any defendant to be discharged from the indictment or information, in order that he may be a witness for the prosecution.

Source: SDC 1939 & Supp 1960, § 34.3626; SDCL, § 23-44-7; SL 1978, ch 178, § 290.



23A-22-8Corroboration of accomplice's testimony required for conviction.

A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice unless it is corroborated by other evidence which tends to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense. The corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offense, or the circumstances thereof.

Source: SDC 1939 & Supp 1960, § 34.3636; SDCL, § 23-44-10; SL 1978, ch 178, § 284.



23A-22-9(Rule 26.1) Notice of issue concerning law of foreign country--Sources considered--Determination as question of law.

A party who intends to raise an issue concerning the law of a foreign country shall give reasonable written notice. A court, in determining foreign law, may consider any relevant material or source, including testimony, whether or not submitted by a party or admissible under rules of evidence. The court's determination shall be treated as a ruling on a question of law.

Source: SL 1978, ch 178, § 293.



23A-22-10(Rule 27) Proof of official record or lack of record.

An official record or any entry therein or the lack of such a record may be proved in the same manner as in civil actions.

Source: SL 1978, ch 178, § 294.



23A-22-11(Rule 28) Appointment and compensation of interpreter.

A court may appoint an interpreter or translator of its own selection and may set reasonable compensation for him.

Source: SL 1978, ch 178, § 296.



23A-22-12Dying declarations defined--Admissibility in homicide prosecutions--Admissibility for defense.

Dying declarations are statements of material facts concerning the cause and circumstances constituting the res gestae of any felony made by the victim voluntarily while not mentally ill and under the fixed and solemn belief that his death is inevitable and near at hand.

In all prosecutions for manslaughter or murder, all dying declarations are always admissible in evidence, if the deceased would have been a competent witness if living.

All such declarations are also admissible in behalf of the defense.

Source: SDC 1939 & Supp 1960, § 34.3632; SDCL, § 23-44-4; SL 1975, ch 169, § 7; SL 1976, ch 324; SL 1978, ch 178, § 283.



23A-22-13Overt acts required for conspiracy conviction.

In prosecutions for conspiracy in a case where an overt act is necessary to constitute the offense, a defendant cannot be convicted unless one or more overt acts are expressly alleged in the indictment or information, and unless one or more of the acts alleged are proved, but any other overt act, not alleged in the indictment or information, may be received as evidence.

Source: SDC 1939 & Supp 1960, § 34.3637; SDCL, § 23-44-12; SL 1978, ch 178, § 285.



23A-22-14Proof of incorporation of bank not required in forgery or counterfeiting prosecution--Expert testimony as to forgery or counterfeiting.

In prosecutions for forging a bill or note of an incorporated company or bank, or for passing or attempting to pass, or having in possession with intent to pass, any such forged bill or note, it is not necessary to prove the incorporation of the bank or company by its charter or act of incorporation, but it may be proved by general reputation, and persons of skill are competent witnesses to prove that such bill or note is forged or counterfeited.

Source: Supreme Court Rule 401, 1939; SDC 1939 & Supp 1960, § 34.3641; SDCL, § 23-44-14; SL 1978, ch 178, § 286.



23A-22-15
     23A-22-15, 23A-22-15.1.   Repealed by SL 2012, ch 132, §§ 1, 2.



23A-22-16Proof of marriages in bigamy prosecutions.

In prosecutions for bigamy, it is not necessary to prove either of the marriages by the register, certificate, or other record evidence thereof, but they may be proved by such evidence as is admissible to prove a marriage in other cases, and when the second marriage took place out of this state, proof of that fact, accompanied with proof of cohabitation thereafter in this state, is sufficient to sustain the charge.

Source: Supreme Court Rule 400, 1939; SDC 1939 & Supp 1960, § 34.3640; SDCL, § 23-44-11; SL 1978, ch 178, § 288.



23A-22-17View of place of offense by jury--Protection of jury from unlawful communication.

When, in the opinion of a court, it is proper that a jury should view the place where an offense is alleged to have been committed, or where any other material fact occurred, it may order the jury to be conducted in a body, in the custody of proper officers, to the place, which must be shown to them by a person appointed by the court for that purpose. The officers must be sworn to prevent any person from speaking to or communicating with the jury, and not to do so themselves, on any subject connected with the trial, and to return them into court without unnecessary delay or at a specified time.

Source: SDC 1939 & Supp 1960, § 34.3648; SDCL, § 23-44-18; SL 1978, ch 178, § 292.